Well, for about eight minutes anyhow.
"We have to take back this country and it starts with Glenn Beck's internal organs."
Read More......
It's only when the tide goes out that you learn who's been swimming naked. -- Warren Buffett
Well, for about eight minutes anyhow.
"We have to take back this country and it starts with Glenn Beck's internal organs."
According to columnist Ray Ratto, Brian Sabean shouldn't be expected to have the Giants take a big step forward next year for the following reasons:
1) Teams rarely make two large leaps in consecutive years
2) They don't really have the budget (unless they raise payroll) to sign a really big bat. Math is math!
3) The budget isn't his problem, it's the ownership who sets payroll.
Allow me to compose myself while I digest the stupid.
If Sabean hadn't signed salary hogs like Barry Zito, Aaron Rowand and Edgar Renteria, they'd have more than enough money to go around.
If Sabean HAD signed someone like Adam Dunn for cheap ($10MM/year is his current salary), there wouldn't be as much a need for a big bat.
If Sabean hadn't hamstrung the Giants so badly in years past, their performance this year - which we should remember did not get them into the playoffs - wouldn't be such a huge leap to live up to.
Brian Sabean is a terrible, terrible general manager. He needs no apologists in the media or elsewhere. Throw this one back, Ratto.
I heard the announcers refer to the Miami Dolphins stadium as "Land Shark Stadium" during Monday Night Football's game. It stunned me, and made me curious as to what was going on here. Obviously, it's not Joe Robbie Stadium anymore, but land shark?
The answer is actually pretty depressing:
The Miami Dolphins have a new naming rights deal with Jimmy Buffett's Margaritaville and Anheuser-Busch InBev's joint brewing project, Land Shark Lager, which renamed the facility "Land Shark Stadium."[4] The sponsorship deal is reportedly for eight months and the name will revert to Dolphin Stadium in time for the Super Bowl XLIV and the 2010 Pro Bowl, possibly to be replaced by another sponsor name if a deal can be secured before that time.
I read an interview with Brian Sabean the other day and will probably have more to say about it - I can't get my head around the fact that this numbskull is the longest tenured GM in all of baseball. Here's one quote that should give one optimism, if only they didn't know it was Sabean talking:
“But it’s safe to say we need some more power, quite frankly. The team is going to have to take on a little different personality. As Boch pointed out to me at the end of the year, which makes sense, a lot of times when you have players like Pablo and Bengie who are free swingers, sometimes, especially with a younger team, or a team challenged to score a lot of runs, they’ll take on that personality. In a selfish way you’d like to find somebody who’s different from them who can calm things down or act in the middle of the order in a different way.
“We are going to be challenged in the market. I can’t mention names but you know the names (Matt Holliday, Jason Bay) that are going to be out there. There’s going to be huge action on them, including from their incumbent teams.
I'm a big fan of Joe Posnanski (even if I find it hard to remember how to spell his name). His blog is updated regularly, a hard feat when you acknowledge he's not only a columnist for Sports Illustrated but has a book out (The Machine, available at Alibris!)
Today's article is about the Mean Joe Greene commercial, why it was successful, and it ends with a really nice suprise that reminds you that there are truly good guys in sport and why it's still fun to be a fan even after you "grow up."
And that’s why the Mean Joe Greene commercial — with all its obvious flaws — captures. You can sense (perhaps not through the performance but you can still sense) that this kid idolizes Mean Joe. And Mean Joe — heck, he was called MEAN JOE — doesn’t have any time for the kid. Mean Joe is in pain, and he’s feeling sorry for himself, and he really needs to get back to the locker room to get X-rays (and why are there no trainers around him anyway?). The kid gives him a Coca Cola, and suddenly it hits Mean Joe (through the power of carbonation) that this kid REALLY likes him, this kid looks up to him, this kid has his poster on the bedroom wall and pretends to be Joe Greene on the school playground and is willing to trade 20 Roger Staubach football cards to get one Mean Joe Greene.
And he tosses the jersey across the tunnel. Here you go, kid. This will mean as much to you as it does to me.
What does all this have to do with the greatest thing ever? Well, you knew I would make you work to get here. If you’ve read this site much you know who my all-time hero is — bigger even than Ozzie Newsome. When I was a kid, I only wanted to be like Duane Kuiper. I was a second baseman, like Duane Kuiper. I would dive for ground balls because Duane Kuiper did.
A few thoughts from around the league after four weeks are in the books...
...a league source tells us that the 49ers will indeed meet with Crabtree and Parker today.
But all signs point to Crabtree caving in.
...
In other words, the Niners will be holding firm. Though they possibly will try to find a way to help Parker save a little face, the damage is already done.
Parker and Crabtree have blinked.


Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh says he is teaming up with St. Louis Blues owner Dave Checketts in a bid to buy the St. Louis Rams.
Limbaugh declined to discuss details Tuesday. He cited a confidentiality agreement with Goldman Sachs, the investment firm hired by the family of former Rams owner Georgia Frontiere to review assets of her estate.
Limbaugh also declined to discuss other partners that might be involved in the bid, but said he and Checketts would operate the team.
Forbes magazine has estimated the Rams franchise has a value of $929 million.
The 35-0 thrashing of the aforementioned Rams by the 49ers this Sunday was a pretty satisfying win for a team that would be 4-0 right now were it not for the last minute heroics of Brett Favrego (yes, that's Favre plus Ego) in Minnesota. In particular, Patrick Willis played one of the most dominating games on defense by a 49er since, dare I say it, the days of Ronnie Lott. Sure, they played different positions but Willis and his teammates were EVERYWHERE, scoring three defensive touchdowns, sacking Kyle Boller five times and pitching a shutout. The 49ers recorded their first shutout since the final game of the 2001 season. But there was not the feeling that the team was fully content with the accomplishment, a 35-0 victory, over the winless Rams.
...
The offensive line was not pleased with their performance today against the Rams. Glen Coffee gained just 74 yards on 24 carries (3.1 average), and Hill was sacked four times.
"We're not excited just because we won," 49ers tackle Joe Staley said. "We know we have a lot of work to do."
Said Singletary, "When it's all said and done, our offensive line will be one of the best lines in the league. I think sometimes we just cheat ourselves out of what we can be. We just have to take it to the next level and I know they will."

Here they are, according to Rotten Tomatoes.
I was almost through the list thinking I'd managed to miss every single one, but then I remembered the horror that was Fear Dot Com.
Consensus: As frustrating as a 404 error, Fear Dot Com is a stylish, incoherent, and often nasty mess with few scares.
This well may be the kind of post in which I manage to offend everyone who reads it. Or it might not. It might just be the kind of post that everyone agrees with.
I doubt the latter, but raise it only as a possibility because my conclusions seem so "true" to me that it is indeed hard for me to understand the opposite opinion.
That's not true with politics; even though I vehemently disagree with lots of political viewpoints, in most cases it's not hard to understand that a different outlook and perspective can cause you to see the world wholly differently.
But here? That is harder. Let's break it down.
First, on Michael Vick -- I actually just looked back for the post in which I originally wrote this - and then realized I never did. But here's what I would have said:
What Vick did was morally, ethically and apparently legally indefensible. And whether or not you think the two year prison sentence he got was too lenient or too harsh, he had a trial with a sentence that he served. Some folks were upset that an NFL team signed him, arguing that he should never be allowed to play football again.
That's wrong -- no team should have to sign him, but he served his time. Our legal system said that what he did - which was so disgusting and against what I stand for that I actually have a hard time even thinking about it - was worth 23 months in prison. He did that, and along the way lost his personal fortune. I shed no tears for Vick, because he did inhuman things to helpless animals, and then lied point blank on camera, to the league and to all his fans. My sympathy quotient for his crimes is nil. I wouldn't be happy if he had signed with my 49ers, because I wouldn't want to pay for tickets that helped pay his salary. But he HAS served his time - let him try to work for a living.
The same cannot, however, be true for director Roman Polanski. For those unaware, Polanski is accused of drugging and having nonconsensual sex - that means RAPE - with a 13-year old girl back in the 1970s. Actually, I don't think I even have to say "accused" because he's pled guilty to doing it. Polanski pled guilty, served 42 days in jail, and then fled the country when he determined that his jail time was going to exceed the month-plus he'd already served.
Let's be clear: Polanski has never come back to the country because he didn't want to possibly face a jail sentence for raping a (barely) teenager. Recently, he was apprehended in Switzerland and now faces the time for his crime.
And suprisingly, some people are outraged about this. People like Martin Scorcese, Woody Allen and David Lynch are publicly asking for his release, claiming his arrest is a "miscarriage of jusice."
On the flp side, you have Jewel tweeting that:
"Polanski-admitted raping a 13 yr old-whys every1 in the arts upset hes facing jail? cause hes a gifted director? what am i missing?
Hence, my confusion. Perhaps it's because I am the father of a daughter, but I doubt it. Polanski did a horrible thing, just like Vick. In fact, he bettered Vick in that he didn't deny it when it happened. That's because, basically, he didn't even think he had done anything wrong. And despite 42 days in jail being no picnic, he's never served any penalty for this besides winning an Oscar, directing more films and having to avoid ever coming to the United States. That's a tradeoff I can't imagine he's upset about. I'm a huge fan of Polanski's work. "Chinatown" is one of my favorite movies of all time, "Rosemary's Baby" is a masterpiece, and he richly deserved the Oscar he won as best director for "The Pianist." He's a great artist. Maybe his next film will be a prison movie.
...
In general, I agree with the European view that Americans tend to be prudish and hypocritical about sex. But a grown man drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl? That's not remotely a close call. It's wrong in any moral universe -- and deserves harsher punishment than three decades of gilded exile.
...
Much has been made of the fact that Polanski's victim, now 45, has said she no longer feels any anger toward him and does not want to see him jailed. But it's irrelevant what the victim thinks and feels as a grown woman. What's important is what she thought and felt at age 13, when the crime was committed. Those who argue that there's something unjust about Polanski's arrest are essentially accepting his argument that it's possible for a 13-year-old girl, under the influence of alcohol and drugs, to "consent" to sex with a man in his 40s. Or maybe his defenders are saying that drugging and raping a child is simply not such a big deal.
As far as I'm concerned, it's a huge deal. Even in France, it should be a big deal. This isn't about a genius who is being hounded for flouting society's hidebound conventions. It's about a rich and powerful man who used his fame and position to assault -- in every sense, to violate -- an innocent child.
And it's about a man who ran away rather than face the consequences of his actions. Before any sentence could be imposed, he absconded like a weasel to live a princely life in France.
That's the sort of protagonist, a great director like Polanski must realize, who doesn't deserve a happy ending.
People who call themselves "Libertarians" are, generally speaking, simply people who don't want to admit to you or themself that they always vote for Republicans.
This message has been sponsored by the reality-based community.
-- I posted this from my iPhone, please excuse the mess.
Copyright © 2008 reign of error... - Design by Styleshout | Blogger Template by Blog and Web