January 2008

If You Like Books, Be Afraid

This posting from Andy Sernovitz scares the crap out of me. As someone in the business of selling books, not to mention with lofty and probably wrong aspirations to write a book one day, well...it's just ugly out there:

1. The number of new books being published in the U.S. has exploded.

Bowker reports that 291,922 new books were published in the U.S. in 2006 (Publishers Weekly, June 18, 2007). This includes 47,203 new books in categories covered by BK books: business, economics, sociology, personal finance, philosophy, and psychology.



2. Book industry sales are flat, despite the explosion of new books.

The Association of American Publishers reports that U.S. book sales in 2006 were $24.2 billion, down 0.3% from $24.3 billion in 2005 (Publishers Weekly, May 28, 2007). And U.S. book sales were almost flat from 2000 to 2004 (Publishers Weekly, May 30, 2005).



3. Average book sales are shockingly small, and falling fast.

“Here’s the reality of the book industry: in 2004, 950,000 titles out of the 1.2 million tracked by Nielsen Bookscan sold fewer than 99 copies. Another 200,000 sold fewer than 1,000 copies. Only 25,000 sold more than 5,000 copies. The average book in America sells about 500 copies” (Publishers Weekly, July 17, 2006).


The rest after the fold...(fyi, I feel okay repurposing the whole article since Sernovitz is doing likewise from another source.)

4. Bookstore sales peaked in 2004 and have been declining since.

Bookstore sales declined 1% in 2005, 3% in 2006, and 4% in the first five months of 2007 (Publishers Weekly, February 19, 2007, and July 16, 2007).



5. A book has less than a 1% chance of being stocked in an average bookstore.

For example, the number of business books stocked range from less than 100 (smaller bookstores) to approximately 1,500 (superstores). Yet there are 300,000-plus business books in print that are fighting for that limited shelf space.



6. It is getting harder and harder every year to sell books.

Many book categories – including business, current affairs, and self-help – have become oversaturated. It is increasingly hard to make any book stand out. New titles are not just competing with almost 300,000 other new books, they are competing with more than five million previously published books available for sale. And other media are claiming more and more of people’s time. Result: the same amount of marketing investment and effort today as a few years ago will yield a fraction of the sales previously experienced.



7. Most books today are selling only to the authors’ and publishers’ communities.

Everyone in the potential audiences for a book already has hundreds of interesting and useful books to read but little time to read any. Therefore people are reading only books that their communities make important or even mandatory to read. They have no time to read anything else. There is no general audience for most nonfiction books, and chasing after such a mirage is usually far less effective than connecting with one’s communities.



8. Most book marketing today is done by authors, not by publishers.

Publishers have managed to stay afloat in this worsening marketplace only by shifting more and more marketing responsibility to authors, to cut costs and prop up sales. Nearly all book proposals that we receive from agents now have an extensive (usually many pages) section on the author’s platform and what the author will do to market the book. Publishers still provide an important role of making books available in sales channels, but whether the books move in those channels depends primarily on the authors.



9. No other industry has so many new product introductions.

Every new book is a new product, needing to be acquired, developed, reworked, designed, produced, named, manufactured, packaged, introduced, marketed, warehoused, and sold. And the average new book generates only $100,000 to $200,000 in sales, which needs to cover all of these product expenses, leaving only small amounts available for each area of expense. This more than anything makes publishing a crazy business.



10. The bookselling world is in a never-ending state of turmoil.


The thin margins in the industry, high complexities of the business, intense competition in a small industry, low staff salaries, and expanding competition from other media lead to constant turmoil in book publishing. Translation: expect even more changes and challenges in coming months and years.

Rachael Ray Is Annoying...But She Likes Good Music


Or, at least, less mainstream music than I would have assumed. This, from Pitchfork:

Rachael Ray Asks Battles, Holy Fuck to Play SXSW Party
When we saw this on Idolator, we were like, no fucking way. Yes, we already knew foodie superstar Rachael Ray is an indie rock fan-- she put twee group the Boy Least Likely To (along with Nellie McKay and Puffy Amiyumi) on her Too Cool for School Mixtape for Kids back in the fall of 2006.

But there's a big difference between the Boy Least Likely To's gentle coos and the abrasive instrumental art rock purveyed by Battles and Holy Fuck. I mean, if you try cooking to this stuff, you might end up with a whole arm chopped up in a blender.


Generally speaking, Rachael Ray drives me nuts - she's WAY too perky, and just seems disingenuous. But I have to say, she surprises me here, and that's a positive, I suppose.

A Plane On a Conveyor Belt

Last night, we watched Mythbusters tackle a pervasive online "debate" -- whether a plane moving on a conveyro belt (that is going the same speed but in the opposite direction) could take off...or whether it would be held in motion and bound to the ground.

I'd read about this on kottke.org, among other places and it was quite fun to watch them make it happen. Check out below the fold for the results, courtesy of kottke.org once again.

In order to not spoil the ending, I'm putting it below the fold.



I Did Not Know That

Somehow I missed the fact that Dennis Kucinich dropped out of the race.

That is all.

John Edwards and the Politics of Change

With John Edwards leaving the race today, the Democratic contest gets very interesting. For a guy who was the 2004 VP niminee, Edwards never really got a fair shake from the media (though with Obama and Hilary, it's hard to ignore those big media "stars"). Edwards, despite how many on the right think he's a phony for making money and then decrying the income gap between rich and poor (why those things can't co-exist is ... beyond me), is a very honorable man who definitely influenced what is being discussed as national campaign issues. He and his wife Elizabeth are good people with important things to say, and I thank them for being in the race. (And hope that they endorse Obama...soon.)

And then there is this, which I cribbed from a diary on Daily Kos:

Never before in the history of the United States of American have the voters and delegates of a major political party had to chose their nominee for President from a field that did not include a white male.


It's worth nothing that EVERY Republican candidate is and has been this season, a white male. (No, I don't count Alan Keyes.)

I don't care who you are, that's progress. That's change.

Johan!


As someone who predominantly plays in an NL-Only Auction Baseball league, the arrival of Johan Santana to the Mets is fairly awesome news. As noted before, the National League is - sadly - miles behind the American League in talent level.

But Santana is immediately the best pitcher in the league. And in fantasy baseball, surely fellow Mets teammates Jose Reyes and David Wright are in the top ten or higher.

What I'm saying is...the Mets are going to be sick next year.

What's more, it seems like the Twins got a bit hosed in the deal. More below the fold.
I'm not a baseball junkie in the way I'd know anything about most minor league players, but here's the players received by the Twins, and Rotoworld's take on it:


USA Today believes the Mets have landed Johan Santana from the Twins for Carlos Gomez, Deolis Guerra, Kevin Mulvey and Philip Humber.


A contract extension would still have to be worked out, so even if it is officially agreed to, this will likely linger through Friday at least. It's a pretty disappointing day for Twins fans. Both packages being discussed by the Red Sox and Yankees during the winter meetings seemed more attractive to us. Gomez and Guerra are big-time talents, but Gomez lacks plate discipline and might not fit in the top half of the lineup and an awful lot could go wrong before Guerra even sniffs the majors. Mulvey and Humber are third starters at best and probably more like fourths. It's a whole lot better than losing Santana for draft picks next winter, but we'd have taken a Phil Hughes or Jacoby Ellsbury package over this.


Um, YEAH. If the Twins could have picked up either Hughes or Ellsbury, two of the more promising young players in baseball...on less proven talent? When you are dealing away THE BEST PITCHER IN BASEBALL you kind of want at least a player or two who has shown he can do it in the pros.

Forget about youngsters like Hughes and Ellsbury, who of course are no locks for stardom. When the Mets first got mentioned in trade talks, I remember that the Twins were asking for either Reyes or Wright back in the deal. To move from that (admittedly unlikely) stance to what they got is a serious, serious loss in negotiation for Twins management.

On the other hand, the Twins traded A.J. Piersynzski to the Giants for Joe Nathan, Francisco Liriano, and Boof Bonser. That's an ace closer, a potential ace pitcher (coming back from injury), and an amusingly named guy who is going to be a key part of the starting rotation again in 2008.

Yes, I'm still bitter. But happy that Johan will be up for grabs in fantasy baseball.

Word of Mouth Marketing: It's the Product, Stupid.

How often have you had this experience?

Person A tells you that you SIMPLY have to try something he (or she) loves…it could be watching a TV show, eating at a restaurant, reading a favorite book, or shopping at a particular store. (Or many other such permutations.)

So, you listen, and you take this advice. You read that book, or watch that show…or go out for a meal at the restaurant in question, or peruse the store (online or off).

And you are not impressed. Read more below...


Here are a few of the examples I’ve had in recent months and years.

Enders Game. I know this book is hugely popular – and I didn’t hate it. But I didn’t LOVE it either. I was told by the friend who recommended it that I should read the next book in the series, as I’d definitely like that more. I have hundreds of unread books that I bought because I found them interesting. Why would I read a sequel to a book I found to be just okay?

Extras This series is very good – but in my opinion, it’s not great. The friend who insisted I hadn’t given it a chance had me watch several episodes (all of which I’d seen before) and demanded that I watch the two-hour series finale – which I did. And my new, revised opinion? It’s very good – but it’s not great. (Yeah, that’s the same opinion.)

In San Francisco, or the Bay Area in general, restaurants that don’t impress me the first time don’t get the courtesy of a second trip, because there’s no point. There are so many great restaurants that if I have a bad experience, I’m simply not giving them a second chance.

I think of this because of the keynote speech at shop.org by Andy Sernovitz was all about Word of Mouth (WOM) marketing, and it’s quite the buzz these days. The basic theory being…if you get people excited about your product, they’ll not only do free marketing for you – but it’s more effective than traditional marketing.

In as much as Sernovitz detailed this, it’s hard to argue. (I’ll let you know more once I read his book, which I got at the conference.) But my point here is…that product you are having folks talk about?

It better be good.

Word of mouth marketing – or any type of marketing, for that matter – will only do so much if the product isn’t great. Getting them to your site is a huge part of the battle, but if you disappoint them, getting them back is even harder.

Conspiracy Thinking

This post on Tapped accurately says some of the thinking I've been having about Saint McCain as of late:

...liberals who expect a secret socially liberal McCain to emerge from behind a mask of 0% NARAL ratings, votes for Robert Bork, support for complete bans on abortion, etc. are people you definitely want to invite to your next poker game.

I've been suprised by the NRO conservatives who think that McCain is "too liberal" for their taste -- and because I'm ripe for a good conspiracy theory, here is mine:

By positioning McCain - the likely nominee - as too moderate and mainstream for a true conservative, Republicans endgame is to try and get true moderates and independents to still vote for him in the general election. Republicans will still show up because Clinton or Obama are way MORE liberal than McCain, and this is basically their only hope at the general election.

It's not a particularly sexy theory, but it's all I've got.

A few thoughts on a Monday evening

  • It's a testament to The --er, A Daily Show that it's still quite watchable even during The Writers Strike. That being said, there are at least a couple of times each show that it's not acutely obvious that Stewart is essentially riding solo. Good, but it will be nice when the full writer staff returns.

  • I flew coast-to-coast last week, with a stop in Denver going each way. In those four flights, all of them arrived early or on time. Literally, every aspect of the logistics of the trip went about as smoothly as imaginably possible. I can't quite get over this.

  • Lost starts up again this week. I...am so very excited.

  • With the obvious exception of New Hampshire, everything is pretty much going Barack Obama's way this primary season. And yet, due to the fact that almost half the country is voting a week from tomorrow, it's impossible to know whether he or Hilary Clinton will be the likely nominee. I do hope that - assuming he fares as poorly on Super Tuesday as he has to date - that John Edwards bows out and endorses someone (who I'd assume to be Obama). I like the guy but it ain't happening. Rumors are that Edwards would become the Attorney General under an Obama presidency. It's interesting, and I'd be curious as to what that would mean as it played out -- but I think that might genuinely freak out the National Review Republican, and that'd would be sort of fun to watch.

  • Owning a home is amazing, and we're slowly but surely settling in. But it's a little too easy to spend money these days. I went out to pick up...well, I don't even remember now. But I didn't go in there to buy the six dining room chairs that we ended up stuffing into the back of my truck. That was suprising. Even more so that it was my idea to buy them.

  • I can't really believe the Super Bowl is this weekend and that somehow the New York Giants are the best team in the NFC. If they were more fun to watch, I'd be rooting a little for them, but I can't and pretty much dislike the Giants since Leonard Marshall broke Joe Montana.


  • So, the NFC sucks, and I root for the Forty Niners, who are, let's face it...near the bottom of that sorry conference. In baseball, I'm a National League guy, rooting for the San Francisco Giants. Who, by all rights...will be one of the worst teams in that league, which is clearly inferior to the American League. So, my two favorite sports teams are among the worst in all of their sport. Good times!

  • On the other hand...apparently, Chris Webber is coming back to the Warriors? That's sort of funny, and odd, but as someone who hasn't followed basketball in awhile...reuniting a player and coach whose fractured relationship essentially ruined the franchise for 13 years (a bit of a stretch, but not much), when said player is a shell of his former self and the chemistry on the existing team is quite good...well, that doesn't seem too smart. But what do I know?

  • Yardwork is oddly satisfying, but trying to pull out four small trees from a planter box that blocks our view of our smallish backyard with no more than garden shears is pretty tiring. And way too big to toss into the yard waste bin. So, this weekend, we're bringing in a chainsaw. Good times.

Exile

Richard North Patterson is a seriously good courtroom drama writer. He also does a good job of weaving political issues, mainly from a liberal perspective, into his works. While I have generally moved away from the “beach book,” I picked up Exile a few months ago for a few bucks and thought it would make sense to read while taking a cross-country business trip.

Indeed, it was a good enough read, but at 700-plus pages, it’s waaaay too long. It tackles one of the most complicated, tenuous issues in the world – the Israeli-Palestinian strife. I’d go into the details of the book itself, but frankly I was disappointed by even what the back cover gave away – I write this review more to talk about where Exile goes right and wrong.

Patterson does a good job at presenting both sides of the issue, while taking no pains to show how acts of violence by each side do more harm than good (something I find hard to object to). Patterson obviously traveled to the area for research, and this more than anything else seems to be the reason that over a third of the book (that is, 250-300 pages) is set in the Middle East as the protagonist tries to track down the truth.

It’s all well told, and again, fairly accurate and unbiased – but the story itself suffers for it. I guessed the surprise ending on approximately page 100, and felt let down by the way it got revealed or discussed. While the book does a good job on a complicated issue, there are many better non-fiction writers I’ve read and should read more of about the topic.

All in all, I can’t really recommend Exile, as it’s far too long and the story just isn’t that great. I admire Patterson as a writer, and the way he talks about one of the most polarizing issues in the world today. But this book isn’t worth your time.

Rating: 4.5/10.0

Best. State. Of. The. Union. Ever.

Full disclosure: I didn't watch any of the SoTU, and have no plans to do so though I did read an excerpt of the prepared speech online. Listening to our President talk is an exercise in pain for me, and makes me embarrassed for our country.

So, why is this the best State of the Union ever? Obviously, because it's his last.

Which reminds me that last week I had planned on blogging about how there is now less than a year left in this disaster of a Presidency, but as I was travelling for work and am a moron, I forgot.

But, it's STILL true, thanks to math! Less than a year to go until someone more competent sits in the Oval Office. (Note that this includes virtually every candidate, major or minor, in this years election.)

Douchenozzle of the Month: The Idiocy of AT&T

Look, it's easy to rail against large corporations, but AT&T is just making it way too easy.

As noted, we moved about a month ago, and a few weeks prior, I called AT&T (who provides us with phone and DSL) and arranged for the switch to our new address, which included a change to a new phone number.

Oh, if only things were this easy. Read more to learn about why the monolith that probably provides YOUR phone service appears to be run by drunken toddlers.

The day before our move, I came out to the new house to let the AT&T technician in to install our phone jacks (oddly, the prior owner had just one jack, in (of all places) the garage). The install went well, and we had phone service when we ordered it.

Unfortunately, the internet didn't work right away, and I called AT&T to find out why. They'd cancelled the internet order, though they couldn't say why. Five days after we moved in, we finally got a connection (though admittedly, I did sneak onto some neighbors who apparently don't believe in firewalls).

I thought that was that...until we got our bill and realized we were still being billed for our old phone number. And after calling, the response was shocking:

AT&T knew we had moved to a new house and requested a new number, but said unless we specifically asked to cancel the original number, they'd leave it open.

Got that? I told the person on the phone I was moving, but because I didn't specifically ask for a cancel of my old phone, he assumed I wanted to keep both phone and DSL service in a house I no longer lived in.

I mean, that's not just dumb, that's dumb with purpose. It's the kind of thing the mob would do - because they told me unless I had a cancel order number (I didn't, just the confirmation number for my new order...which I thought was the only number I needed), I was out of luck.

So...that's pretty bad. But resolved after negotiation to a point within reason, thanks mainly to my patient wife.

But...then this week, I went on a business trip and Abby found that our internet service was out for two days. When I got home, I couldn't resolve it and our modem suggested that our broadband connection was down. I called this morning, and...guess what?

AT&T had suspended our service because they didn't have a registered email address for our account.


Got THAT? This is for an account I already had -- I was forced to create an sbcglobal.net email with them when I first opened my account in my prior house...and apparently they didn't know about it.

I mean, that makes sense, right? I create an email account WITH THEM, and then they can't find it...so they suspend my DSL service.

I swear to all that is holy, this people are morons. I do feel sorry for Kyra, the client service associate I unleashed a diatribe on this morning, and she did help me fix the situation so that, frankly, now I can write about what a shit company she works for.

All I know is...at some point in the not too distant future, I'm exploring other options for both phone and internet service. I'd think that going with a dominant company like AT&T would, at the least, give you some professional, seasoned treatment. Instead, they run the firm as if they'd just gotten started.

Those Pesky Giants

No, not those Giants...though I will say I'm both suprised and impressed that they have gone this far in the playoffs, since if I'd had the opportunity and means, I'd have bet heavily AGAINST them in probably every week since the playoffs began.

In other news, I shouldn't bet.

But nope, I'm talking about my San Francisco Giants, who most everyone acknowledges are in for a tough 2008 season. Now, in a refreshing sign of progress, the team seems prepared to let Pedro Feliz (aka Peter Happy) walk, and god bless anyone who wants him. But now there are rumors that the team might sign Scott Rolen, recently traded to the Blue Jays for Troy Glaus. Check out below the fold for my thoughts on why signing one of my favorite players is just flat out stupid.

As noted, I love Scotty Rolen - he plays hard, still has 30 HR potential and a sick glove. You might think my issue with Rolen is that he's virtually unable to stay healthy - nope, though that's a key reason I avoid him in fantasy baseball.

My feeling with him as a Giant is this: it's a waste of money.

What will Rolen bring aside from installing false hope in some fans, maybe 3-4 more wins (which is a lot) and the delay of an eventual solution at 3rd base.

Dallas MacPherson, or someone like him - a youngster who isn't necessarily a long-term solution, but is cheap and has real upside - is the way the Giants should be thinking. 2008 is out of reach. A stop-gap hitter, even one I like quite a bit, isn't going to make me happy about the future of my favorite team.

Rain, Rain, Go Away

And sure, come again another day. We need the rainfall, and I generally like the rain. But...my new backyard has what we might call a drainage "issue" -- others might call it a problem.

Then, there's the fact that I'm not totally sure that my drains aren't clogged from all the farkin trees in the neighborhood (last weekend I bagged four yard bags full of leaves from my backyard). I can't really address or even understand the depths of my problems until it stops raining. So, world - stop it already!

Hillary Picks VP Candidate: Tracy Flick!

This is relatively amusing, a reminder that Election is a woefully underrated film I need to watch again, and also not altogether inaccurate.

The GDP Map


click on the image to enlarge it...

Seen this a few places, including Matthew Yglesias referencing it from Tyler Cowen. It's a map of the US, with the states replaced by the countries that have similar GDP's to those states. Really drives home how gigantic the US economy is.

Russ Feingold for VP?

There's no way that Senator Russ Feingold would even be approached for the VP slot, regardless of whether Clinton or Obama wins the nomination. Taking on the task of either being the first female nominee, or the first African American nominee, would be enough without having a Jewish VP candidate.

I think Bill Richardson, the first Hispanic VP candidate, might still be a stretch, but a more possible one - and I say this as a member of the (Jewish) tribe.

But...

Feingold would rock - his candor and honesty, and what he genuinely stands for is impressive. And he absolutely torches John Edwards in this interview:



I did notice that as the primaries heated up, all of a sudden, all the presidential candidates — none of whom voted with me on the timeframe to withdraw from Iraq — all voted with me and when we did the Patriot Act stuff.

The one that is the most problematic is (John) Edwards, who voted for the Patriot Act, campaigns against it. Voted for No Child Left Behind, campaigns against it. Voted for the China trade deal, campaigns against it. Voted for the Iraq war … He uses my voting record exactly as his platform, even though he had the opposite voting record.

When you had the opportunity to vote a certain way in the Senate and you didn't, and obviously there are times when you make a mistake, the notion that you sort of vote one way when you're playing the game in Washington and another way when you're running for president, there's some of that going on.


I mean, that's pretty brutal - though admittedly it's easier to rip on Edwards than either of his Senate colleagues. But those are pretty fair points - it's good that Edwards admits his mistakes, but...he only served one Senate term. For him to look back on that many important votes and regret his actions, that's pretty shoddy.

Chris Matthews Apologizes

I would guess that the following video is not supposed to impress me. From Talking Points Memo, where I got this video, Josh Marshall writes:

Chris Matthews just gave one of the weirdest, 'I'm for the little guy', 'I love politics', 'women rock' half-defensive, half contrite apologies I've heard in some time in the lead in to Hardball just now.

I don't really see it that way.



I actually see Matthews - who I think is a twit, a virulent sexist and often does more harm than good, though he's not nearly as bad as Tim Russert - doing what most people really don't do. He's apologizing. He says that he sees how badly his comment came across and understands why it was hurtful. In an era where our President still can't think of anything he's done wrong in the worst presidency ever, where admitting fault seems to be indicative of weakness, I find this refreshing.

Sorry if this means I have to hand in my angry liberal card.

Just because I can't seem to get rid of the "More after the fold," I should add here that I think Matthews ignores the obvious fact that this is not an isolated incident. Media Matters has an extensive, accurate list of many similar trangressions, located here.

But for this one? His apology, at least to me, is accepted.

Smash Lab

We watched the first episode of this last night and I have to channel John Hurd from "Big" when I say...I don't get it.

It's obviously a way that Discovery Channel is trying to milk the popularity of a far better show, Mythbusters. But...I seriously don't get it. The point of yesterday's episode was to replicate aerated concrete, which is admittedly a cool technology that helps runaway planes. So...they tried to replicate this for cars.

Sort of.

Look, I like things crashing, but they never really said WHY they were trying to replicate this - was it so that new roads could be paved with it? To test out some theory? the beauty of Mythbusters is that their tests are designed to prove or dprove things (generally speaking, myths, though often they are barely that...but there's still a test.)

This seemed simply like an excuse to crash a series of cars. Cool for the folks on the show...but not interesting enough for a full hour.

I think they should have simply doubled the Mythbusters budget and be done with it.

Jessica Simpson is Not The Devil.

Is there any actual person out there who thinks that Jessica Simpson is in any way responsible for the Dallas Cowboys losing?

And/or Tony Romo playing at less than perfection?

Or that she shouldn't look more like this photo more of the time?



People who actually think that guys can be too distracted by women, whether it's sex or romance, and not compete at their best...well, that's sort of crazy. Sure, young athletes can be tempted by a lot and not have their "A" game...and certainly, in the week prior to the biggest game of your life, any type of vacation seems a bit frivolous - but it's not like Romo missed practice. The entire team had that time off, so why not go to Mexico?

Tony Romo is mowing through big blonde singers with large racks, and god bless him for it. Don't think that his teammates don't ask him who is more fun, Carrie Underwood or Simpson, and it's strange to blame someone for this.

Here's another photo I dug up and it's both interesting and disturbing...because remember when Paris Hilton was dating Brian Urlacher? Remember how no one thought ill of Urlacher, but instead gave him an attaboy, since I believe this happened just after her sex tape was leaked and she became famous for being...a drunken, rich whore, I guess?

Well, LOOK HOW FREAKING YOUNG she looks here. That creeps me out.

But here's what's interesting, at least to me. I searched around for a picture to put here to show how she can look hot and...well, legal. And it's not that there aren't tons of inappropriate photos of her acting like a moron - this is what she does, it defines her. Looking for naked pictures of Paris Hilton isn't the hardest task in the world, and there are many of her more scantily clad than this - but...just not looking all that sexy, or pretty. (Relatively speaking of course - she's pretty, and when combined with her party slut persona, there's obviously some appeal there.) But I genuinely struggled to find a picture of her that I thought she looked genuinely hot in. This is the best I could do. Anyhow, I found that suprising.

Whew!

Man, take a week off and it's hard to jump back into the blogging, but blog I must. Here then, are a random assortment of things I thought of during the last week or so, all of which I thought, “Hm…that seems like something worth writing about.”
A few to start out with, and more after the fold.

  • The weekend games, especially Saturday’s, were some of the best football I’ve seen in awhile. And though anything could happen this weekend, the Packers-Patriots Super Bowl that seems to be shaping up might be the ultimate matchup most folks are craving. Think of it – if you could choose a Super Bowl that did NOT feature your favorite team, wouldn’t this be the one you’d want? Sure, the Cowboys might be more talented (though that’s far from certain), but they are the EVIL Cowboys. Most people don’t have anything rational against the Pack, and the hate on the Patriots (aside from the, cough, cheating) seems to be that they are too damn good. Watching a Super Bowl that determines how high on the Quarterbacks Mt. Rushmore Brett Favre or Tom Brady is placed, let alone a 19-0 season, would be fun.

  • Which means it will be the Giants-Chargers in the ultimate snore fest.

  • Speaking of bad matchups, does the concept of Romney vs. Clinton sicken YOU as much as it does me?


  • The Adam Carolla Show – no longer available on my actual goddamn radio – had a feature of about under and over-rated movies. The Aceman himself stated that Superbad is over-rated. No…that’s just wrong. McLovin…McLovin…McLovin. (But he did accurately say the same thing about Napoleon Dynamite which just flat out isn’t that good.

  • Speaking of that radio program, I listen to it online now and I can honestly say I haven’t missed Danny Bonaduce a whit. If I’m curious about how often he has sex with his 25 year old girlfriend, or what he’s doing with his condo, or lots of references to his prior drug use or …wow, that’s even making me tired thinking about it. I was going to say that if I miss that, I can listen to his ONE HOUR show he rides solo on, but I think if I miss that, I need to check myself into rehab.

  • Played craps for about two hours in Reno this weekend and I must say, it was insanely fun. One of the few times I’ve realized I could have wasted a whole evening gambling that didn’t involve poker with my friends.

  • You may think that the whole race hubbub with Obama and Clinton is overblown, and certainly the beating that Tim Russert is getting is well-deserved…but if you also think that Clinton herself had nothing to do with folks bringing up race, you’re crazy. And frankly, I’m happy that – in general – Obama consistently takes the high road. That may not get him elected, but this does seem like one election where the old school of politics might not work. (And if you like Clinton, realize that this tactic is straight out of Karl Rove’s playbook. Happy?)

  • Speaking of Tim Russert, Matthew Yglesias wrote a fantastic article beating him down that is well worth your read.
    Actually, the balls Russert favors may be hard, but the pitches he throws aren't curveballs, which go someplace useful. They're sillyballs, which go somewhere pointless. Russert has created a strike zone of his own where toughness meets irrelevance.

  • The Writers Strike is now pissing me off. Though I must say, we’re about to start Season 4 of The Wire, so there’s an upside to everything.

  • And yes, , that includes Scrubs, which isn't even that good anymore. (But I do like Sarah Chalke...)

  • Owning a home is expensive. I had a plumber come by last week to inspect a squeaky toilet he had installed – turns out our water pressure is dangerously high, and in order to fix that, we need a new pipe going to the street. I have several friends who have told me that when it comes to your house, “Everything is $1000.00.” Well, guess how much the plumber estimated this work at?

  • I almost created a Douchenozzle of the Week for this, but in the interest of expediency, let me just say this – AT&T blows ass. When we recently moved, I called to change my number to my new address, etc. Apparently, even though I told them I was moving, I didn’t specify that I wanted the old number cancelled. Which means we paid for almost a full month of service we didn’t use. AT&T can’t seem to see anything wrong with this scenario, which means – yep, they’re a big bunch of douche nozzles.

  • At this point, the Britney saga is truly sad. Can we lock her up? At least her kids are away from her now.

  • No, I’m still not watching American Idol. I’m just sort of sad that my prediction that Paula Abdul would go crazy, land in rehab and be banned from the show turns out to be false.

  • Rudy Giuliani – exactly what are you still doing in the race?

  • Can I be the first to make the joke that the new head of the Dolphins is James Gandolfini? (His name is Tony Sparano, which is pretty easily confused with the epic mob boss, yes? (Answer – nope. Not even close.)

On New Hampshire

I can't say anything about it, obviously, that hasn't been said by smarter people who spend a lot more of their time following such things. On the one hand, I'm glad my California primary vote might actually mean something - but I'm worried the state in general could help out Hillary, who I don't want to win the nomination. I do think Obama is just as much of force as he was two days ago - which should be fairly obvious, but if you listened only to the bobbleheads on TV, you might think he was a flash in the pan today, while yesterday he was almost a shoo-in for the nomination.

What's clear - whether it affected real votes or not - is that folks like Chris Matthews absolutely loathe Hillary, and I would not be suprised if some primary voters took sympathy on her for the way she has gotten treated in the press. The faux-news story about her crying, the way Chris Matthews screams about her and to her in the debate and elsewhere...it's not fair, and people don't like that.

This early in the primary, it's hard to know what we have on our hands. But it's nice that, for neither Hillary or Barack, they'll have to earn the nomination the good old fashioned way.

What I Listened To

I've been meaning to post this, and frankly wanted to do it on New Years Day when it would be the most exact...but things have gotten in the way, like work, life, following what appears to be an interesting political primary season and the fact that my 49ers just hired another offensive coordinator I've referred to as "one of the dumbest coaches in football" -- more on all of that later.

But since I generally have Last.Fm on while listening to iTunes, and try my best to synch up my iPod with it, it does a pretty good job reflecting what music I listen to over a period of time. Surely, it's not exact...but it's - as we might say - directionally accurate.

What's interesting to me, as I believe I've noted elsewhere, is that so many of the artists I listened to in 2007 were barely on my radar, if at all, in 2006 or earlier.

Here's my top ten:


The National
Feist
Caesars
Heartless Bastards

Spoon
Interpol
Silversun Pickups
Mew
Midlake

Editors


While I started listening to some of these bands in the last quarter of 2006 (such as Mew, Silversun Pickups and Caesars), with the exception of Spoon, Interpol and the Editors, the rest are bands I hadn't heard until 2007. Or, mostly, even heard OF. Those "new to me" bands above, and below, are in bold text.

This is good news for music. More after the jump, including the rest of the list.

I'm a bit shocked by how much I listened to Feist, but in retrospect, I not only did go a bit overboard with The Reminder, but it's a CD my wife loves listening to, so it got extra play because of that.

Let's check out more of the list, shall we?

Sleater-Kinney
Minutemen
The Shins
Band of Horses
The New Pornographers
Radiohead


Well, that's more like it - all of these are bands I've listened to awhile (I'm listening to BoH right now, in fact)...and Sleater-Kinney, Minutemen and Radiohead are three of my all-time favorite bands.

Voxtrot
The Frames
The Submarines

Had neither listened to nor heard of any of these bands before last year. Apparently, I like them all a lot. Also worth pointing out is the seasonality here -- Voxtrot and The Submarines are bands I listened to a great deal in the first half of the year - but The Frames much, much more in the last half. Not sure what that means, though.

Cat Power
Beck
Iron & Wine
Amadou & Mariam
Ratatat
The Clash
Bloc Party
Neil Young
Peter Bjorn and John
The Hold Steady

Uncle Tupelo
Goldfrapp
Battles
Weezer
The White Stripes
Explosions in the Sky
The Snake the Cross the Crown
I Love You But I've Chosen Darkness
Ramones
Frightened Rabbit
The Long Winters
The Like Young
Jenny Lewis with The Watson Twins
Stars of Track and Field
Regina Spektor

Elliott Smith
Arcade Fire
Kaiser Chiefs
Victory at Sea
The Smiths


That's a lot of bands that are new to me, and had I bored you more by posting the entire list, this trend would flow through (though probably not as much, since the numbers start getting pretty low pretty quick.)

While lists like this at mp3.com (the top albums, artists and tracks of 2007) are awful, they bear no real resemblance to the quality and quantity of music out there right now. It's a good time to be a music lover, that's for sure.

The New Hampshire Primary

It's on like Donkey Kong, and looks like Clinton-Obama will go down to the wire. (The Wire, by the way, being Obama's favorite show...indicating good taste. Hilary said hers was Grey's Anatomy...) My guess is that Obama edges Clinton (the polls practically dictate as much) and that, depending on their mood, the press will either say this kills HRC, or that pulling close is got her back in the race. The fact that they could go either way is pathetic...

It seems a foregone conclusion that McCain wins New Hampshire, but I'd love silly Mitt Romney to take the state. I doubt that happens, though. But I enjoyed the early returns for the GOP almost as much -- because right now, Fred Thompson is polling at 1%, three times as bad as..."Write-In"...yes, folks...remember this was the conservative savior at one point.

Type rest of the post here

Barack, JFK, Reagan, FDR...

Matthew Yglesias has this to say:

Bill Richardson mentioned in response to a question about whether or not "relative youth" is a detriment in Presidential politics that JFK was his idol. Among Democrats of a certain age, this seems to be an incredibly common sentiment. Barack Obama's campaign often likes to invoke JFK. And in The Washington Monthly, Ted Widmer complains that Obama is no JFK.


But from where I sit JFK, um, wasn't a very good president. His signature accomplishment was . . . the Peace Corps? Basically, boomers seem to have taken the Kennedy/Johnson years, attributed all of the Vietnam stuff to Johnson even though Kennedy initiated the policy, then attributed all of the popular domestic stuff to JFK even though almost none of it passed while he was president, and then you get a lot of hand-waving. At some point, can't we act like grownups and let this drop. The Republican hagiography of Ronald Reagan is embarrassing but the JFK business is even more detached from reality.


With respect, I'm not sure that's the point. More after the fold.


I do agree with Yglesias that the record of Kennedy's administration isn't particularly impressive from a historical perspective, for all the reasons stated above. But Kennedy inspired tens of thousands of voters to believe in him and to believe in the system. It's the fact that he has got people believing in him and that he might be someone to effect some actual change. How couldn't someone in his shoes represent change in the White House?

In the early 1960s, apparently being Catholic was pretty strange, too, for someone considering the job. Maybe that's another thing they share. Kennedy is held in a special place not because of what he did, but for what he symbolized.

Or so I'm told. I'm old, but not that old.

Since I've been conscious, the only guy who came close - and didn't get there -was Bill Clinton. Because as much as he was fun to vote for because I liked him and thought he'd do a good job, I didn't necessarily believe in HIM. Liked him? Sure. And his speeches were rewarding and impressive, and he stood for, generally speaking, what I stand for. The only other presidents I know who have inspired other voters in a remotely similar way are Franklin Roosevelt and, yes, Ronald Reagan.

Undoubtedly, there have been many others who ran and inspired huge audiences - and never took office. Surely that is one very possible outcome with Barack Obama.

But without putting the cart too far ahead of the horse, whether or not Obama wins anything else, there's a few things I can't help think about:

  • For voters 42 and under, the winner of every election they've voted in has resulted in a Bush or a Clinton taking office. I've seen scores of comments about this particular thing on pro-Obama boards. If that age group shows up strong at the polls, Obama is going to be doing okay. By the way, this group includes me and while I'm obviously aware of this fact, it's really only attributable to the loathsome George W. Bush. But...if this is something people specifically don't like, Hillary truly does have problems.


  • I watched Ken Burns documentary on WWII a few months ago, and was struck, as I have been many times before, with the comments by some people that they'd had photos of Franklin Delano Roosevelt hanging in their homes. And I know that some homes had Reagan's photo hanging, though I don't know any of those people personally. JFK's picture also hung in many homes across the country, and you can be sure that if Obama does win, he'll be the first President who is featured in any reasonable populace of homes in the country. Maybe I am wrong on this, but I doubt it.

  • I'm genuinely suprised - and happy - that Bill Richardson doesn't seem to be on Hilary's side, and rumors persist that he'll throw his weight behind Obama if and when he drops out of the race. Richardson would be a great VP or Cabinet choice, and adds a ton of credibility, even if he's seemingly not voters choice for President.

  • As much as I don't like Hilary, there's no doubt that she'd be a better president than any single person on the Republican side of the ticket. My least favorite Democrat is miles ahead of my most...acceptable Republican, who would have to be Ron Paul, despite some of his crazy ideas.

  • Despite the fact that he's a batty old codger who just gleefully said he'd be happy with armed forces in Iraq for the next 100 years, the only candidate I'm hoping isn't the nominee is John McCain. The press worships him, and ignores some of his battiness, hypocrisy and the fact that often, he's just the person the press pretends he's not. But putting all that aside? He's probably smarter than any of the other candidates. However, if this truly is an election about change - and surely one exit poll isn't enough to make that a foregone conclusion - its' hard to see how even McCain is going to fare well here.
    Updated: Harold Meyerson adds this:The gap between the candidates' ages (McCain is 71, Obama is 46; that's a 25-year difference) would probably be the greatest in American presidential election history. Something that would be pretty hard for voters to not notice.

  • Rudy Giuliani is about gone. That's a stunningly bad campaign. Imagine - finally, a socially liberal Republican runs for President, and gets 4% in his first primary. Good times, Rudy.


Fantasy Sports Is Here To Stay

Not exactly a news flash, but if anyone thinks fantasy sports are an isolated fad, they are crazy. And this is proof:

In todays Pittsburgh-Jacksonville playoff game (and likely, the prior game between the Seahawks and the Redskins), the NFL aired a commercial for it's own Fantasy Football Playoff Contest.

First of all, giving up that ad revenue is a pretty big decision, and the fact that - shudder with me here - they did it to that godawful "So You Had A Bad Day"song -- means it was an expensive decision. But the fact that it's for a fantasy football PLAYOFF game is, to me, the proof in the proverbial pudding.
Look, I know a LOT of people who play fantasy football, and it's quite clearly a huge industry that most folks accept is no longer a fringe interest. But I know fairly few people who, like me, play fantasy football playoffs. It's GREAT, and in some ways like a salary cap league that occurs during the regular season. But it's far less common.

A fantasy football playoff commercial is pretty ridiculous. And I love it. Just lose the song.

As for the first playoff game, I was shocked to see that every ESPN football columnist picked the Redskins to win - though in fairness, I think Bill Simmons picked the Hawks. While Seattle isn't great, they seemed to be - before and during the game - a notably better team. I'm not sure how to say this without it sounding crass and insensitive so let me preclude it by saying that I feel horribly about the loss of Sean Taylor, and I don't doubt for a second that it helped motivate the team to play better over the last few weeks. But that can only take one so far, and going into Seattle is always tough to do. The reality is that the Redskins are a very decent team, but in really no aspect of their game are they extremely good. You can't really go deep in the playoffs that way, even if you are inspired.

But, good on ya, Redskins. As for Seattle, going into Green Bay is going to be just as tough for them as it was for the Skins today. That should be a great game and we'll be watching it up in Tahoe.
Yeah, boy.

Now That's A Storm

Last weekend, meteorologists were talking about an upcoming storm so powerful we should all be on guard...and that the rainfall would take the Bay Area from historical lows to at or even above seasonal averages.

They said the storm would start Wednesday afternoon, then Thursday morning, and then yesterday afternoon. It did rain yesterday, but lightly, and I woke up this morning with my usual scoff at the morons that pose as weathermen and women.

Uh...not so fast. As usual, I'm eating my words.

That's the beginning of the Richmond-San Rafael bridge...for those new to the blog or with short memories, I just moved to San Rafael and...well, this is part of our daily commute. That bridge spent most of the day closed because several big rigs BLEW OVER from the high winds.


More after the fold, including more photos from a serious, serious storm.


I actually drove into San Francisco early this morning, to meet the Salvation Army at our old flat. They actually showed up and loaded up the truck with my ratty old stuff, something that clearly earns those guys a special reward somewhere down the line. Just brutal.



The drive into the city took longer than usual because there was just so much damn rain. Some drivers slowed to crawls, while most of us just tried to stay out of each others way - I almost hydroplaned twice, and saw a gigantic lightning bolt out over the Marin Headlands. (Lightning in the Bay Area is especially rare, for those who don't live here.)

On the way back to Marin, I talked with Abby who simply could not get to work. She's a lot better of a person than I am, and was also the only person scheduled to be there this morning, so she persisted even though at that point, Highway 101 was closed in San Rafael due to construction materials falling across the freeway, and again, the Richmond Bridge was closed. She actually tried to go through the city, but eventually conceded it was futile and holed up at her folks house, where she still is hanging out the storm.



That's Mill Valley, and that's much LOWER water than I drove through in several places as I fumbled my way home. Luckily, I know the area and winded my way through Marin to avoid the horrid, horrid backups on the freeway. What do you do when the only freeway in the county simply shuts down? Those local roads weren't too crowded, though some had large branches, even trees in lanes. At literally every spot, debris from trees were simply everywhere.

The good news is that our new home seems to be fine - no leaks, the somewhat shaky looking trees we have worried about look (knock on the wood they're made of) strong and disinterested in the storm, which is a good thing. There are large puddles of water that have collected in both the back and front yard, and this is NOT a good thing...but we knew we had drainage "issues" when we bought the place. Hopefully they're small ones.

In any case, stay dry wherever you are, and Mr. Meterologist? Sorry for doubting ya.

Newer Posts Older Posts